Weapons I'v Carried: Part IIIb

Weapon’s I’ve carried Part IIIb: Shotguns and submachine guns cont.

So you don’t think I’m a Rambett or anything like that, this is the final section of Weapons I’ve carried . . . for now.

During the DOJ Academy we were trained with the Benelli, 12 gauge, auto loading shotgun. It was long, heavy and the recoil was pretty strong. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7U8cjl8HlM ) Of course I was already sold on the Remington 870. I liked the pump-action. With the Benelli, all we had to do was muscle the nozzle on target and keep it there, while simply pulling the trigger.  Well, that and try not to dislocate your shoulder. 

The Remington 870, if jammed, could usually be fixed in the field. I’ve done it myself during an actual combat situation. Range Masters have told me if the Benelli jammed in the field, the only thing it could be used for, until brought in for repair, was as a club. This was one of those situations where it was obvious by the way they taught, even the Range Masters were not enthusiastic about the weapon.    

My training on the Benelli was short and to the point. I learned all the fundamentals but gained no enthusiasm for the weapon. The firearm instructors pointed out, several times if I remember correctly, that carrying the Benelli was completely voluntary. So I paid attention, because hey someday my life might depend on me being able to operate the Benelli.  But I was relegating it (the Benelli) to the bottom of all my contingency plans.

Now our training on the H&K MP5 (http://www.hk-usa.com/military_products/mp5_general.asp) was more involved and required a lot more hands on. This meant fun, fun, fun and more fun. The MP5 is a submachine gun, it fires 9mm rounds. The safety or select fire has two to four selections. Safe, single shot, two round bursts, and fully automatic. 

During the DOJ Academy we shot the MP5 quite often. The targets we were required to shoot at were one third the side of normal targets. We were told if we were sent to Assault Weapon School we would have to qualify on the smaller targets.

We were taught to hold and control the MP5 by holding the forearm (which encases the barrel) with our non-dominate hand and the pistol grip with our dominate one.  When we started, our elbows and arms were up and parallel to the ground. We would twist our arms down to our side while pulling the weapon stock into the pocket of our shoulder. This twist pull motion helped to maintain control while firing.

Our MP5s had slings. Because both the MP5 and HK53 were considered secondary weapons, if at any time there was a need to ditch the assault weapon, I could drop it and it would swing to my side as I drew my primary service weapon (My Glock 26, 40mm semi auto).  Thank goodness for the lefties that came before me. Someone figured a way to make the tangled belts into a viable sling for southpaws.  In fact when I ‘let it hang’ my assault weapon swung to my right side out of the way when I pulled my primary weapon.    

Toward the end of the DOJ Academy the Head Range Master had us all fill two magazines. He smiled and told us we could go fully auto with the two magazines – to get it out of our systems. Firing fully auto, we all quickly found out how hard it was to control the weapon. Yes, we had been warned, but until I fired on full automatic I didn’t understand why spraying a machine gun was considered a complete waste of ammo.

In order to carry the MP-5 after the DOJ Academy, I had to apply for Assault weapon school with the approval of my supervisor. Let me tell you, that was some serious fun. When we arrived at school first order of business was to qualify expert with our handguns. If anyone failed to do so they were sent packing. No pressure there.

We were not told this was a prerequisite and we came in to training cold – unprepared -- for a preclass qualification. The instructors told us our handguns were our primary weapons and if we could not fire them in an expert manner we didn’t need to be there. Two fellow trainees were sent packing.

At this training class the instructors brought both the MP5 and the HK53 to train on. I was told if I qualified with the HK53 I would be eligible to carry either weapon on-duty. So I took on the HK53.

Next we sat in a classroom and went over the MP5 and the HK 53 (http://www.remtek.com/arms/hk/mil/53/53.htm). We took them apart, learned how to clean them and put them back together.

The MP5 is a submachine machine gun. It fires 9mm (handgun) ammunition. The HK53 is a scaled down rifle that fires .223 (rifle) rounds. Main difference between the MP5 and the 53 was the HK 53 shot that .223 rifle round. This photo will show the difference between 9mm and .223 ammo. (http://www.arizonagunlist.com/gun_reference_material.html)

We went out on the shooting range and shot, and shot and shot. If our weapon was not on safe it was on fully auto, however we had to learn how to fire in two round bursts. Not as simple as it sounds.  The targets we had to shoot were small so our groupings (pattern which develops while shooting at a target)  were expected to be tighter (closer together).  Nothing short of expert shooting would pass the course.

Then we had to do mock into entries buildings. The way we trained the third person through the door during the service of a search warrant held the assault weapon. Simply, put if officers were shot at during an entry it was the third person through the door who usually took the round. By replacing a handgun in that third position with a submachine gun the outcome was more in the officer’s favor.  

During my DOJ Academy training with the MP5, I shot decent enough to know I could pass the training even though my groupings were not as tight as they could be. The HK53 was different, both the sound (about as loud as a shotgun blast) and recoil (only slightly greater than my handgun) were greater when shooting the 53. I’m not sure why, but I held the weapon even tighter because my groupings were fan-freakin-tastic. For that reason, among a few others, I absolutely loved carrying the HK53.

I would have carried the HK53 throughout my entire career, but someone in power decided the 53 needed to be treated as a rifle. This meant long range firing, a new shooting school and finding elevated platforms to shoot from. Translation: a whole lot of precarious climbing. My brain said do it, do it. My body, being the realistic one, said ‘hey – you forty-something-year-old – try it and die.’  

So I went to carrying the MP5. Not my HK53, but I still had lots of fun shooting it and I remained on the entry team as the third person through the door.         

Today a lot of guns and assault weapons have ambidextrous safeties, Making everyone’s life easier.

      

                  

Weapons I'v Carried: Part IIIa

Weapon’s I’ve carried Part IIIa: Shotguns and submachine guns

I split this final section into parts A & B, but hey we’re talking about the coolest toys and they needed a little extra finess.  

In the CHP Academy I was introduced to the Remington 870, 12 gauge, Pump Action Shotgun. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdW2TAfN3mQ). When I went to the CHP Academy back in 1983, women reported a week earlier than men. Because we (women) were at a disadvantage – we were the weaker sex, don’t cha know - we needed the extra training to make sure we made it through the Academy.

If I sound a bit snarky – I am.  There were definite perks in letting women go to the Academy a week before their male counterparts:

Academy Orientation – we had the run of the layout, of learning the schedule and inner workings, preview of Physical Training (PT), Weapons, Emergency Vehicle Operations Course (EVOC) and the all important one-on-one with women CHP officers at the Academy.

Now most of that was excellent training and we (women) definitely received an advantage going to the Academy early, but me being – well me – I only seem to really remember Academy Staff  members taking us (women) out to the EVOC track and showing us (women - only) how to change a freakin’ car tire. 

Seriously, first they gave us handouts to review and then we went out to the high speed track and received a step by step demonstration.

It wasn’t until years later I realized I had been insulted. At the time I was simply, but majorly peeved. I asked my female Academy mates if they had ever changed a tire and every one of them answered yes. Turns out, I was not the only one who had a brother or father teach them how to maintain their own vehicle so that brother or father no longer had to. 

Then to add fuel to my ire, when the discussion of our first week came up with the males in our class, a few of them readily admitted they had never changed a tire. One even said “That’s what AAA is for.”    

Me thinks I still be a bit peeved about that. I will take a deep breath and let it go . . . again.

Back to weapons training at the Academy.

Officer Danoff, a female officer who worked as a Firearms Instructor at the Academy, took the women cadets, during that first week, for orientation at the firearms range. She went over basic weapons handling, which included the shotgun. Ofcr Danoff showed us the best way to handle and fire the shotgun to prevent the weapon’s kick from beating the hell out of us.

Danoff showed us how to widen and balance our stance, place the shotgun butt in the pocket of our shoulder, to keep it seated there, and to lean forward slightly to minimize the kick. Until you fire an improperly tucked shotgun, you don’t realize just how much of a kick (or bruise) you can get.

Before that orientation was done I was acutely stiff, severely sore, but I knew how to properly hold and fire a shotgun. Later that evening we female cadets sat around comparing our first in a long line of deeply colorful academy bruises.

During the CHP Academy we shot both 00 buck and slug rounds. Let’s just say the slug rounds left bigger and better bruises.

The Remington 870 is a great tactical shotgun. There is nothing like the sound of ‘pumping’ a round into the chamber. Talk about psychological warfare. I have been present during group fights (usually gang or alcohol related) where officers tried repeatedly to get the combatants attention. One officer racked a round into the chamber of his shotgun and I’d swear every fighter came to immediate attention as if they were military trained.

This video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woIHhXBTQPs&feature=related ), has so-so sound quality, but you definitely hear when he engages the pump action. Truly that sound is distinctive and attention getting.  

I will stop here and post the final section in a few days.

Weapons I've Carried: Part Two

At the DOJ Academy, which was only eight weeks long, Fridays were dedicated to firearms training. I mentioned previously my apprehension of semi-automatic firearms. Several factors were at the root of my worry. 

First and foremost, I am left handed. Most firearm safety is geared toward right handed people. So going from a revolver with no safety to a weapon with a safety in an awkward position made me think: Great. After eight years I’m going to have to become a right-handed shooter.    

That response is not nearly as flippant as you may think. A lot of left-handed people who entered a police academy became right handed shooters at the ‘encouragement’ of trainers coupled with the influence of equipment manufacture. In fact, I remember being told to find a way to make it work or switch hands. Initially I thought what unflexible buttheads. Then, when I stopped and thought about it, I realized all the shooting courses I’ve done involved times where every participant had to shoot with their non-dominate hand. After all, what happens when in the middle of a gunfight if you get shot in your gun hand? No, calling a timeout is not a viable option, at least that’s what my instructor told me.

Fortunately, for me the Glock only has a trigger safety. Point and shoot. Simple enough. The magazine release gave me a little bit of trouble because it’s on the left side of the gun and I had to learn how to cant my gun and push the release with my index finger to release and remove the empty magazine while still aiming at the target. Took some practice but I did learn how to ‘make it work’.

The Glock was such an easy weapon to transition to. My confidence bolstered, I began carrying my Walther PPk/s. Only problem, well in truth there were several, the first being my Walther was not a Glock. It had a safety. Next, all the guys thought my Walther was a sissified gun. I won’t tell you what they had to say about James Bond. What I will tell you is they made lots of references to kitty cats.

The positive about the Walther was it was easily concealable and the .380ACP ammunition was closely comparable to 9mm ammunition. I carried my Walther as a back-up weapon, because it was so light weight and easy to hide.

Did I ever mention how thrifty (my nice way of saying cheap) most cops are? Two words no cop can resist: Discounted Gun. One of my co-workers (Tim) wanted a Glock 26, which is a scaled down version of the Glock 19 – it’s also called a Baby Glock. Well Tim did some research which included brokering a deal for a group discount. So a group of us (yes, I’m thrifty too) decided to purchase Glock 26’s (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzj14q7nBJ0&feature=related), Initially, the Baby Glock was going to be my undercover and off-duty weapon only.  Problem was even for me, a woman, my pinky finger could not fit on the butt of the weapon.

Most of the guys I worked with modified their Glock 26 by adding an extended magazine. The extension gave you a place to rest your little finger, but it also extended the butt of the weapon which (in my mind) defeated the purpose of the smaller version. Because my Baby Glock did not feel comfortable to me in my grip, I regulated it to the position of back-up weapon only. You know that weapon that might be awkward, but is compact and hidden for that Oh Sh#t! moment.

Right around this time Walter – our Head Range Master -- introduced me to the concept of carrying the same weapon on-duty/off-duty/under-cover, basically at all times. His argument: muscle memory and familiarity could save our lives.

Walter believed switching back and forth between weapons undermined all our training and preparation for the unexpected and terror filled events that come with drawing and firing our weapon in the line of duty. Yes, our duty weapons were somewhat large and a bit awkward, (especially for undercover work). However, as with anything, practice, training and a lot more practice made carrying my Glock 19 and later my Glock 23 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3H93SMqVLu0&feature=related) comfortable and invisible. 

So even with several weapons at my disposal I pretty much carried my Glock 23, 40cal handgun on my person on-duty/off-duty and undercover. For two years I was assigned to a Task Force in Palm Springs, California. Palm Springs is arguably one of the hottest places on earth, six months out of the year temperatures exceed triple digits on a daily basis. Wearing shorts and t-shirts I was able to wear my Glock 23 in an approved on-duty holster, attached to my left side where no one was the wiser.  

I liked my Glock 23 so much that when I was retired I purchased it from my department.       

This video gives a comparison of Glocks and it shows how some of the attachable lights and lasers work. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_ruaWNaWMs&feature=related)

STTA: Today there many weapons, pistols and sub-machine guns that have transitional safetys or ambidextrous safetys. The best way to find out if a weapon’s safety can be modified for a left-hander is to look at the manufacturer’s website.

I will be posting Part III in a few days. There I will cover shotguns, and sub-machine guns.

Weapons I've Carried: Part One

Which firearm (model and caliber) did you carry on the job? Is it very different from your personal firearm?
Melissa

Melisssa wow, that simple question had my mind take off in ten different directions at once. So I decided to blog on all the weapons I carried on and off the job and why. Earlier, I gave you my abridged answer, here is the expanded version.

Back in 1983 I was issued a Model 67 J frame Smith and Wesson six shot revolver that shot .38 rounds. Back then the CHP had a policy all officers had to carry the same weapon. (see: http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product4_750001_750051_764935_-1_757787_757787_757787_ProductDisplayErrorView_Y) In the academy, just prior to graduation, we impressionable cadets were given the opportunity to purchase a Model 60 five shot revolver that also shot .38 rounds (see: http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product4_750001_750051_765498_-1_757910_757787_757787_ProductDisplayErrorView_Y )  We were told it would make an excellent off-duty weapon. AND if we purchased it right then we would get the side plate engraved with the CHP logo at no charge.

Yep, I and most of my classmates bought one. I won't tell you how those chuckle-heads cooled my weapon after engraving with water and never cleaned and oiled it. I also won't say how they managed to fully rust up a stainless steel revolver. Nope not saying a word about that.

This was one of those times the CHP policy of having all officers firearms annually inspected by the Range Master probably saved my life. During the inspection he (the Range Master) noticed rust on the screws and completely disassembled my weapon finding my real nasty, I mean rusty, surprise. My issue was quickly taken care of, but I learned several life lessons before stepping foot in my newly assigned CHP Field Office:

1) My safety is paramount to me, never assume it's that important to anyone else.
2) If my life depends on a piece of equipment the more I know about how it works the safer I am.
3) A lone twenty-two year old female can intimidate a gun shop full of men with the right look and mannerisms. – twitching is highly underrated.

Back to weapons.

So for the first few years I carried a six shot on-duty and a five shot scaled down model off duty. The five shot fit very nicely in my rear jean pants pocket.        

After I was pretty sure I was not going to get fired and for tax purposes (well, it's not like I was a gun nut or anything) I bought about one gun a year. My second off-duty weapon was a Walther PPK/s .380 semi-automatic pistol (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enM_F7rfnNY ) . I had absolutely no training on automatic weapons, but James Bond carried one so that was good enough for me.

I carried it two maybe three times afraid every single second the mysterious automatic hand pistol was going to go off and shoot me in the arse. Didn't matter it actually had a safety switch. I knew nothing about them so I locked it up and put it away. And went back to my trusty, more familiar, Model 60 - five shot.

When the CHP finally allowed officers to carry something other than a .38 I went out and purchased a .357 Model 686 six shot revolver (http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product4_750001_750051_764964_-1____ProductDisplayErrorView_Y). Initially those of us carrying .357s had to load it with .38 ammo while on-duty. A .357 revolver with fire .38 ammo or .357 rounds. A .38 revolver will only fire off .38 rounds. A few years later the CHP relaxed its stand and allowed officers to carry either .38 or .357 ammo.

When I left the CHP and went to the California Department of Justice, we were given the choice of Colt .45 (http://www.rc-trucks.org/colt-45.htm) automatics or 9mm Glocks, either the Model 17 or 19 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZAervPTtvo&feature=related). When the Glock was described as an idiot proof semiautomatic I raised my hand.

I will continue Weapons I’ve Carried, which will cover my DOJ years, in my next blog post.

Agencies and their Weapons

Do all agencies carry/issue the same weapon?

The answer to that question is a simple no.  The explanation is much more complicated.

There can be a large list of reasons an Agency selects a specific weapon: Cost, familiarity, functionality, specificity, total coolness and how badass will I look when I pull my weapon, to name a few.  Some Agencies even let personnel chose whatever they want (within reason) so long as they train, qualify and upkeep the weapon according to Departmental Policy.

I believe I may have mentioned before, but cops tend to be a tiny bit competitive. And even when impractical will err on the side of looking good vs being right. Because of that completely juvenile mentality – of which I was totally committed to- most States had to develop guidelines under which law enforcement officers are trained. Now depending on the type of weapon a specific amount of training is required. The more potential for mass destruction the greater the amount of training required. Of course this simply meant we got to blow stuff up during training rather than in the office, or more embarrassingly, in a patrol car.  

In California there is POST – Peace Officers Standards and Training. No one can be considered a peace officer in California unless they have a POST Certificate. Having a POST certificate means successful completion of a specific training regimen that includes physical conditioning, firearms training, less-lethal weapons instruction, methods of arrest, vehicle training, ethic and a whole lot more.

STTA:  Federal Agents are not considered Peace Officers in the state of California. Federal Agents DO NOT have authority to arrest people under California laws unless an agency grants them the authority. And that can only be done on a case by case instance.

I will go further into Academy training in another blog.

As well as some of the reasons behind the no-love-lost (mostly hate) relationship between Federal law keepers and State Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs).  See, even our acronyms are cooler than their’s - sorry couldn’t help myself.

Okay back to weapons.

An agency can decide if their officers carry revolvers, semi-automatics, shotguns, sub-machine guns, or tasers and a whole lot more.  The choice of armament is usually based on the amount of training a Department is willing to provide their officers.  POST requirements are minimum guidelines. For liability reasons most agencies exceed POST training requirements.   

During my CHP Academy training I had 144 hours of weapons training. Only six of those hours were spent in the classroom. The largest block of time -- seventy-six hours -- was spent firing our weapons down range at a paper target. The rest of our weapons training was spent running through shooting courses (twenty hours), Night Firing (twenty-two hours), shotgun training with the Remington 870 (eight hours) and more.

After we completed the above weapons instruction/training in order to satisfy POST, all cadets had to successfully complete an Officer Safety Course Qualification. To pass a score of 270 out 300 was required. That meant out of thirty rounds, twenty-seven better hit their mark. Every cadet had three chances to pass. If you failed during your third attempt you were out of the academy.

Once in the field we had to qualify every other month. Same rules applied, minimum passing score 270. If an officer failed to qualify he suffered a fate worse than firing. Public humiliation and ridicule. No warm fuzzies from fellow officers.  In fact, upon graduation from the academy, anyone not sporting an Expert shooting pin (perfect score) definitely heard about it.

Let me explain it to you the way it was presented to me by my Field Training Officer. “Do you really want to put your life in the hands of an officer who misses?” I had never shot a handgun before entering the Academy and yet I graduated having missed qualifying as Expert by one round. The training was that good.  

And to make things even more complicated, some Agencies allow their Detectives to carry weapons their patrol personnel are not allowed to carry. I won’t even go into specialized units.

Yet.